ABSTRACT
Background: Despite acne being a common dermatological problem, there is a paucity of literature addressing the knowledge, attitude and practice about it. Aims/Objectives: To find out what patients know about acne, its cause and treatment, as well as myths, misconceptions and attitude towards it. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive questionnaire-based study on acne patients at Maharana Bhupal Hospital, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. Results: Most (84.8%) patients belonged to the age group of 16–25 years. The majority (63.9%) presented 12 months after the onset of acne. More than half had average knowledge, a positive attitude and good practices, related significantly to gender and education. Limitations: A standardized questionnaire suitable for all dialects and regional languages would have yielded more uniform results. Conclusion: Study revealed that acne patients still need to acquire accurate, adequate and easily accessible information to seek timely and appropriate treatment, and alleviate their psychological suffering.
ABSTRACT
Background : The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant psychological impact on the General Public, Health Care Workers, Elderly, High-risk groups, etc. Higher fear is likely among the quarantine population. Aim of this study : To evaluate the fear and stress of individuals in quarantine; to determine the possible factors that are influencing the Psychological reactions of the individuals in quarantine compared to the general population; to provide a basis for future Government policies. Methods : A semi-structured questionnaire that included a pre-tested, 7-item Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) was used for data collection. A total of 245 responses were received. Through random sampling, 50 participants each were chosen from the general and quarantine populations. p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results : Individuals in quarantine had a greater fear of COVID-19 compared to the general population (p=0.0059). Symptomatic fears like clammy hands (p=0.032), sleep disturbance (p=0.00026) and heart palpitations (p=0.000034) were commoner in the quarantine population. The younger age group in the quarantine population was comparatively more affected by News and Social media (p=0.00018). Getting a negative screening test resulted in lesser fear both in the quarantine (p=0.017) and general populations (p=0.002). Conclusion : The individuals under quarantine have greater fear possibly due to stressors like transmitting the infection to family, working on the frontlines, being in high-risk groups, losing jobs, and exposure to social media. However, negative screening tests were shown to reduce the fear.
ABSTRACT
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a leading cause of significant morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Evaluation of anti-diabetic drug use pattern guides the healthcare professionals to identify early signals of irrational prescribing and to plan interventions to optimize the benefits of pharmacotherapy.Methods: Observational descriptive study was conducted on 500 prescriptions of T2DM patients collected from Outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Prescriptions were analysed for type, number, generic/brand names, fixed dose combinations (FDCs) of anti-diabetic drugs and anti-diabetic drugs prescribed from within National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) 2015.Results: Average number of anti-diabetic drugs per prescription was 2.5. Of these 49% were from within NLEM and only 39% were prescribed by their generic names. Among all the anti-diabetic groups of drugs used, biguanide (32.85%) was the most frequently prescribed followed by insulins (25.4%) and DPP-4 inhibitors (13.75%). Combined drug therapy was more prevalent than monotherapy (70% versus 30%). Metformin+sitagliptin and metformin+linagliptin were most commonly prescribed fixed dose combinations.Conclusions: Recent trend of anti-diabetic drug use included newer anti-diabetic drugs in combination with metformin to achieve better euglycemia and to minimize complications of T2DM.
ABSTRACT
Background: Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severe, life‑threatening mucocutaneous adverse drug reactions with a high morbidity and mortality that require immediate medical care. The various immunomodulatory treatments include systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis and tumor necrosis factor‑α inhibitors. Aim: The ideal therapy of Stevens– Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis still remains a matter of debate as there are only a limited number of studies of good quality comparing the usefulness of different specific treatments. The aim of this article is to comprehensively review the published medical literature and frame management guidelines suitable in the Indian perspective. Methods: The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL) assigned the task of preparing these guidelines to its special interest group on cutaneous adverse drug reactions. The group performed a comprehensive English language literature search for management options in Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis across multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane) for keywords (alone and in combination) and MeSH items such as “guidelines,” “Stevens–Johnson syndrome,” “toxic epidermal necrolysis,” “corticosteroids,” “intravenous immunoglobulin,” “cyclosporine” and “management.” The available evidence was evaluated using the strength of recommendation taxonomy and graded using a three‑point scale. A draft of clinical recommendations was developed on the best available evidence which was also scrutinized and critically evaluated by the IADVL Academy of Dermatology. Based on the inputs received, this final consensus statement was prepared. Results: A total of 104 articles (meta‑analyses, prospective and retrospective studies, reviews [including chapters in books], previous guidelines [including Indian guidelines of 2006] and case series) were critically evaluated and the evidence thus gathered was used in the preparation of these guidelines. Recommendations: This expert group recommends prompt withdrawal of the culprit drug, meticulous supportive care, and judicious and early (preferably within 72 h) initiation of moderate to high doses of oral or parenteral corticosteroids (prednisolone 1‑2 mg/kg/day or equivalent), tapered rapidly within 7‑10 days. Cyclosporine (3‑5 mg/kg/day) for 10‑14 days may also be used either alone, or in combination with corticosteroids. Owing to the systemic nature of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach in the management of these patients is helpful.
ABSTRACT
An open label randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the quality of life (QoL) and safety of newly diagnosed stage 1 hypertensive patients randomized into two groups of 30 receiving either enalapril 5 mg or losartan 50 mg per-oral once daily for three months. QoL was assessed at the baseline and at the end of study using SF-36v2 health care questionnaire. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored. Investigations at baseline were compared with those after intervention. Pre & post-intervention QoL transformed scores within each group and change in the same between two groups were analyzed using paired and unpaired t-test respectively. Transformed scores of role limitation due to energy/fatigue, emotional well being and general health domains improved significantly in both treatment groups. Scores of bodily pain improved significantly (p=0.0008) in losartan group only. Results were not significantly different between two groups (except for bodily pain). No serious ADR was reported.
ABSTRACT
Lipuma equates continuous sedation until death (CSD) to physician-assisted suicide/euthanasia (PAS/E) based on the premise that iatrogenic unconsciousness negates social function and, thus, personhood, leaving a patient effectively 'dead'. Others have extrapolated upon this position further, to suggest that any use of sedation and/or opioids at the end of life would be analogous to CSD and thus tantamount to PAS/E. These posits sit diametrically opposite to standard end-of-life care practices. This paper will refute Lipuma's position and the posits borne from it. We first show that prevailing end-of-life care guidelines require proportional and monitored use of sedatives and/or opioids to attenuate fears that the use of such treatment could hasten death. These guidelines also classify CSD as a last resort treatment, employed only when symptoms prove intractable, and not amenable to all standard treatment options. Furthermore, CSD is applied only when deemed appropriate by a multidisciplinary palliative medicine team. We also show that empirical data based on local views of personhood will discount concerns that iatrogenic unconsciousness is tantamount to a loss of personhood and death.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesics, Opioid , Therapeutic Uses , Attitude of Health Personnel , Death , Deep Sedation , Ethics , Ethics, Medical , Euthanasia , Ethics , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Therapeutic Uses , Palliative Care , Ethics , Personhood , Philosophy, Medical , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Suicide, Assisted , Ethics , Terminal Care , Ethics , UnconsciousnessABSTRACT
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The associated liver failure and sepsis further challenged the management of DKA. We present a case of an 11-year-old boy presenting with severe DKA being precipitated by hepatitis A virus and leptospira co-infection. The patient presented with severe metabolic acidosis and features of cerebral edema and developed oliguric AKI. In addition, rhabdomyolysis was noted during the course of DKA which probably contributed to the AKI. We, therefore, describe the difficulties faced and the steps taken differently from usual DKA management to manage this case.
ABSTRACT
Background: The wide and indiscriminate use of drugs has increased the incidence and the modes of presentation of cutaneous drug reaction. Understanding the nature of ACDRs may help narrow down the search for the offending agent. Aim- The study aimed to evaluate incidence, assessment of causality, severity and preventability of Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions as a part of Pharmacovigilance from a rural northern Indian medical school. Material and methods: The current survey was executed by the department of Pharmacology in collaboration with Department of Dermatology, MSDS Medical College, Fatehgarh among 7692 patients attending Dermatology OPD during March-December 2014. CDSCO ADR Reporting Form, WHO causality assessment scale, Hartwig and Siegel’s Assessment scale and Modified Schomock and Thronton’s preventability assessment scale were used as study tools. All the doctors, residents, interns and students were encouraged to notify any suspected ACDRs. Patients were screened and recruited if they presented with visible skin lesions suspected to be drug related. As per Modified Schumock and Thornton Scale, 43.5% of ACDRs were ‘Definitely preventable’ followed by ‘Probably preventable’ (30.4%) and ‘Not preventable’ (26.1%). Results: 23 patients (0.3%) were detected to have one or other type of ACDRs. Fixed drug eruption was most common form (34.8%) of ACDRs followed by Acneform eruption and Urticaria in 21.7% and 13% respectively among study subjects. The most common drugs responsible for ACDRs were prednisolone, betamethasone and isoniazid for Fixed drug eruption, while matronidazole, cotrimoxazole and paracetamol for acneform eruption. Antimicrobials, other steroids and NSAIDs were responsible for other spectrum of ACDRs. On assessment of Causality of ACDRs, it was noted that more than half (52.2%) of them fall under probable category. Severity assessment of ACDRs revealed that majority (65.3%) of them was moderate in nature. Conclusion: Awareness on part of the physician can help in timely detection of cutaneous reactions, thereby restricting damage from them. Pharmacovigilance activity is significantly effective in increasing the reporting of ADRs. Study with long-term follow-up and monitoring of the patients with bigger sample size is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Background: Identification of factors affecting utilization of primary eye health services would help the government and other eye care providers to address inequity issues in their eye care program. Aim: Therefore this study was planned to find out barrier to utilization of eye health services among people living in rural western Uttar Pradesh. Material and methods: The current community based cross-sectional survey which involved both qualitative and quantitative methods, was conducted among the residents. A total of 216 study subjects participated in the study. Factors in the supply side influencing utilization of eye health services by people from the community were sought through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and Key Informant Interview (KII). Results: Almost 80% of the respondents had agriculture as their major occupation and > 1/4th were from lower caste community. Regarding the seeking of eye care services, 52.4% respondents who gave a positive history of an eye problem in the family told they attended the nearest health facility; CHC, PHC or SC while 19.2% did actually go to the eye health center. Only 4.8% respondent did not seek any service. Among 112 respondents who were aware of one or other eye diseases, 74.6% identified dirty things fallen into the eyes as the cause of an eye problem followed by 50.3% of the respondents who pointed out injury to the eyes as the culprit. For emergency problem in the eyes 79.2% respondents told that they sought services from health facilities without delay, while 15.4% gave priority to starting household treatment. Conclusion: Raising awareness of the community about eye diseases and the services available together with strengthening of primary eye health services available at the local health facilities could help bring eye health services in closer proximity to the rural population.
ABSTRACT
Background: Voluntary eye donation depends on the awareness levels of various stakeholders in the community. Today’s medical students are tomorrow’s stakeholders of the community. Medical professionals can enhance eye donation rates by educating and motivating the relatives in case of patient's death. Aim: Hence the present study was undertaken with an objective of assessing the promoting factors for eye donation among medical students. Material and methods: The present descriptive cross sectional study was carried out among undergraduate students of a medical college in western Uttar Pradesh in the month of February 2014 using pretested self administered questionnaire. Results: 77% students knew about eye donation. 51% of them were willing to donate their eyes. Only 39% students knew that the ideal time for eye donation is within 6 hours of death. 64% had knowledge about vitamin A’s important role in prevention of childhood blindness. TV, newspaper or other media were the most important channels of getting information for majority (60%) of the students. Regarding perceived promoting factors for eye donation by them, noble cause (57%), pleasure to help the blind (51%) and inspired by advertisement on television (42%) were 3 top most promoting factors. Conclusion: Inclusion of different preventive and promotive aspects of corneal blindness along with basic eye health care into the course curriculum is the need of the hour.
ABSTRACT
Serous ovarian cancer is the most common malignant ovarian tumour. Traditional management consists of surgical resection with postoperative chemotherapy. Currently neoadjuvant chemotherapy is offered to patients with advanced stage disease. The present study aims to analyse the histomorphological alterations in serous ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Correlation of these morphological alterations with survival is also presented here. Serous ovarian cancers from 100 advanced stage cases were included; 50 were treated with pre-surgery chemotherapy. Semi-quantitative scoring was used to grade the alterations in tumour morphology. Survival data was correlated with the final morphological score. Tumour morphology was significantly different in cases treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT group) as compared to cases with upfront surgery. The CT group cases showed more fibrosis, calcification, and infiltration by lymphocytes, plasma cells, foamy and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. The residual tumour cells had degenerative cytoplasmic changes with nuclear atypia. Patients with significant morphological response had a longer median survival, although it did not attain statistical significance in the current study. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in management, the pathologist needs to be aware of the altered morphological appearance of tumour. Further studies are required to establish a grading system to assess the tissue response which can be helpful in predicting the overall therapeutic outcome and the prognosis of patients.
ABSTRACT
Formation of an aneurysm in the sinus of Valsalva of the aortic root is usually due to an area of congenital weakness in its wall. This aneurysm may progressively dilate and rupture into any of the cardiac chambers or into the pericardial cavity. Though this is conventionally treated by surgery, interventional therapy using various closure devices is becoming more common. Embolization of these closure devices may occur. We report a case of embolization of such a device into the left pulmonary artery which during surgical retrieval, unmasked the hidden ventricular septal defect (VSD). Therefore one has to be cautious while making a diagnosis of rupture of the sinus of Valsalva of right coronary sinus without VSD.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm , Coronary Sinus , Diagnosis , Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular , Pulmonary Artery , Rupture , Sinus of ValsalvaABSTRACT
This case report presents a 25-year-old female patient with anterior dislocation of right shoulder secondary to seizures as a complication of eclampsia. This is an unusual mechanism of injury, but similar to other uncontrolled muscular contractions caused by electroconvulsive therapy, etc. To the best of our knowledge only one such case has been reported in the English literature. Closed reduction under general anaesthesia was successfully achieved. High suspicion in patients complaining of pain over shoulder joint is necessary for early diagnosis of this condition.
Subject(s)
Humans , Eclampsia , Joint Dislocations , Pain , Shoulder , Shoulder DislocationABSTRACT
<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Concerns about the life shortening effect of opioids is a well known fact in the medical world when considering administration of these drugs for symptom alleviation at end of life. This study described the patterns of opioid use among cancer patients referred to a hospital-based specialist palliative care service for symptom management. This study also examined whether opioid use among terminally ill cancer patients during the last 2 days of life had any influence on survival.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>A retrospective review of case notes of patients who were diagnosed with terminal cancer and had passed away in a 95-bedded oncology ward between September 2006 and September 2007 was conducted. Data were collected on patients' characteristics and patterns of opioid use including opioid doses and dose changes at 48 hours and 24 hours before death.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 238 patients who received specialist palliative care, of whom 132 (55.5%) were females. At 48 hours and 24 hours before death, 184 (77.3%) patients and 187 (78.6%) patients had received opioids, respectively. The median daily doses at 48 hours and 24 hours were 48 mg and 57 mg oral morphine equivalent doses (OME), respectively. Indications for opioid use were pain (41.1%), dyspnoea, (29.1%) and both dyspnoea and pain (30.8%). In the fi nal 24 hours, 22.3% patients had a reduction in their mean opioid dose while 22.7% required an increase in their mean opioid dose. Increased age was associated with decreasing opioid doses (P = 0.003). Patients with spinal metastases required higher doses of opioids (P = 0.03) while those with lung metastases required lower doses (P = 0.011). Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival curve revealed no significant survival difference between those who were on opioids and those who were not. Log rank test (Mantel-Cox) (P = 0.69).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Our results showed that opioids are safe medications for symptom alleviation in terminally ill cancer patients during the last days of life and have no deleterious influence on survival.</p>
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Analgesics, Opioid , Therapeutic Uses , Medical Audit , Neoplasms , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Terminal CareABSTRACT
Interest in the speed with which patients recover post operatively, the type of deficits that anesthesia may induce in them and the overall profile of their physiologic and psychological states, has grown rapidly over the last two decades. Recovery from general anesthesia is dependent on factors governing drug sensitivity and drug disposition. In our study of 60 males and 60 females we have tried to find out if there is any significant difference in males and females, in their emergence from the effects of general anesthesia. This was a double blind study carried out in hundred and twenty patients, aged 18-70 years scheduled to undergo elective general surgical procedures. Patient recovery was observed continuously after the termination of anesthesia. Timings of initial wake up events were recorded by the anesthesiologist who was blinded to this study. The time from discontinuation of anesthesia to eye opening was 6.87 +/- 2.54 min [P < 0.001; t test] for women versus 8.78 +/- 2.66 min in men; time to respond to verbal comm and was 7.53 +/- 2.05 and 9.61 +/- 2.14 min in women and men, respectively [P < 0.001; t test]. Considering the multitude of factors that may influence recovery, the gender effect appears to be a strong one. The difference could probably be explained by differences in physiology, enzyme activity etc. Investigators have noted that normal differences account for changes in function of the GABA receptor known to be important in the action of many anesthetics